Sign in to Manage
Number of records : 706 |
Result 111-120 of 706 for |
Result Pages:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 Next
111. Watson Todd, R., 2001, Introduction from self-selected concordances and self-correction, System, Vol.29, No.1, pp.91-92.
Location: |
Thailand |
Type of subjects/data: |
Postgraduate students |
No. of subjects/data: |
25 |
Instruments: |
Written report, Concordance |
Method of analysis: |
- Check the patterns induced from the self-selected concordances whether they matched the concordances
- Check the patterns induced against the COBUILD dictionary
- Analyze students' attempted corrections
- Rate corrections as correct or incorrect |
Other aspects: |
|
Research design: |
|
Level of detail: |
Medium |
Keywords:
Induction, Concordances, Self-correction, Thailand 112. Machida, S., 2001, Japanese text comprehension by Chinese and non-Chinese background learners, System, Vol.29, No.1, pp.103-118.
Location: |
Australia |
Type of subjects/data: |
Students |
No. of subjects/data: |
28 |
Instruments: |
Test, Interview |
Method of analysis: |
- Compare scores for pronunciation, meaning and word-comprehension in context of 2 groups of the subjects
- Score text comprehension
- Identify strategies used by the subjects |
Other aspects: |
|
Research design: |
Quasi-experimental research |
Level of detail: |
Low |
Keywords:
Japanese as a second/foreign language, Reading comprehension, Kanji character, Schema, Compensation strategies 113. Gorsuch, G.J., 2001, Testing textbook theories and tests: the case of suprasegments in a pronunciation textbook, System, Vol.29, No.1, pp.11-136.
Location: |
Japan |
Type of subjects/data: |
Students |
No. of subjects/data: |
24 |
Instruments: |
Test |
Method of analysis: |
- Score pre- and post-test by using descriptive strategies: mean, SD, min/max, skewness, and kurtosis
- Compare test scores by using Wilcoxon Matched-Pairs Signed-Rank Tests
- Test reliability and construct validity
- Estimate generalizability of the students' performances using GENOVA |
Other aspects: |
|
Research design: |
|
Level of detail: |
High |
Keywords:
Pronunciation acquisition, Pronunciation assessment, Test validity, Task generalizability, Pronunciation training 114. Porte, G., 2001, Losing sight of errors: the effects of typographical conditions on error salience in L2 proof-reading, System, Vol.29, No.1, pp.137-148.
Location: |
Spain |
Type of subjects/data: |
Students |
No. of subjects/data: |
60 |
Instruments: |
Task/ activity |
Method of analysis: |
- Calculate mean error recognitions scores using SPSS
- Compare error recognitions scores for 4 conditions using one-way ANOVA
- Analyze significant differences using Post hoc multiple comparison of means differences (Scheffe Test) |
Other aspects: |
|
Research design: |
|
Level of detail: |
Low |
Keywords:
Errors, Computer-assisted learning, Revision, Reading strategies 115. Chung, J.S.L., 2000, Signals and reading comprehension - Theory and practice, System, Vol.28, No.2, pp.247-259.
Location: |
Hong Kong |
Type of subjects/data: |
Student |
No. of subjects/data: |
403 |
Instruments: |
Test |
Method of analysis: |
- Perform multivariate analysis of varience (MANOVA) on total reading comprehension scores, macrostructure scores and microstructure scores
- Conduct paired t-test to determine the significance of the differences between two samples |
Other aspects: |
Internal consistency of the test |
Research design: |
|
Level of detail: |
Medium |
Keywords:
Cohesion, Coherence, English as a second language, Reading comprehension, Conjunctions, Lexical signals 116. Li, Y., 2000, Linguistics characteristics of ESL writing in task-basd e-mail activities, System, Vol.28, No.2, pp.229-245.
Location: |
United States |
Type of subjects/data: |
Students |
No. of subjects/data: |
22 |
Instruments: |
Task/ activity |
Method of analysis: |
Use computerized text analysis program to analyze e-mail writing |
Other aspects: |
|
Research design: |
|
Level of detail: |
Medium |
Keywords:
Computer-assisted language learning, Computer-mediated communication, English as a second language, Electronic mail, Second language writing, Writing assessment 117. Lao, C.Y. and Krashen, S., 2000, The impact of popular literature study on literacy development in EFL: more evidence for the power of reading, System, Vol.28, No.2, pp.261-270.
Location: |
Hong Kong |
Type of subjects/data: |
Students |
No. of subjects/data: |
130 |
Instruments: |
Test, Questionnaire |
Method of analysis: |
- Score the test
- Perform analyses of covarience (ANCOVA) to control for the differences in test scores |
Other aspects: |
reliability |
Research design: |
Quasi-experimental research |
Level of detail: |
Low |
Keywords:
Popular literature, Literacy development, Reading 118. Leeke, P. and Shaw, P., 2000, Learners' independent records of vocabulary, System, Vol.28, No.2, pp.271-289.
Location: |
United Kingdom |
Type of subjects/data: |
Student |
No. of subjects/data: |
175 |
Instruments: |
Questionnaire, Interview |
Method of analysis: |
- Conduct frequency count
- Content analyses to the interview data |
Other aspects: |
|
Research design: |
Survey research |
Level of detail: |
Low |
Keywords:
Vocabulary, Language acquistion, Independent learning 119. Mochizuki, M. and Aizawa, K., 2000, An affix acquisition order for EFL learners: an exploratory study, System, Vol.28, No.2, pp.291-304.
Location: |
Japan |
Type of subjects/data: |
Student |
No. of subjects/data: |
403 |
Instruments: |
Test |
Method of analysis: |
- Mark the tests
- Perform Spearman's rank correlation of prefixes and suffixes |
Other aspects: |
|
Research design: |
Exploratory research |
Level of detail: |
Low |
Keywords:
Affix knowledge, Vocabulary size, Order of acquisition 120. Gamaroff, R., 2000, Rater reliability in language assessment: the bug of all bears, System, Vol.28, No.1, pp.31-53.
Location: |
South Africa |
Type of subjects/data: |
Educators of teachers |
No. of subjects/data: |
24 |
Instruments: |
Essay |
Method of analysis: |
- Compare individual rater's scores
- Compare the average scores of six groups of raters
- Examine the relationship between judgements and scores of individual raters |
Other aspects: |
|
Research design: |
|
Level of detail: |
Medium |
Keywords:
Reliability, Validity, Interater reliability, Errors, Equivalent scores, Equivalent judgements, Subjectivity, Moderation, Levels of proficiency |