| Number of records : 706 | Result 31-40 of 706 for |
Result Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 Next
31. Braine, G., 2001, When an exit test fails, System, Vol.29, No.2, pp.221-234.
Location: Type of subjects/data: Students No. of subjects/data: 258 Instruments: Test, Interview Method of analysis: - Analyze the exit test prompts and exit exam transcripts
- Score guides used in writing class to evaluate exit examsOther aspects: Test scoring guide Research design: Level of detail: Low
Keywords:
ESL students; Writing programs; First-year writing courses; Exit tests
32. Tseng, Y. -C. and Liou, H. -C., 2006, The effects of online conjunction materials on college EFL students' writing, System, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 270-283.
Location: Type of subjects/data: College students No. of subjects/data: 19 Instruments: Test, Task/ activity, Questionnaire, Corpus Method of analysis: Wilcoxon Signed Rank Sum test statistics
Error analysisOther aspects: Task design Research design: Level of detail: Medium
Keywords:
Conjuction, English writing, Cohesion, Corpus, CALL
33. Hincks, R., 2005, Measures and perceptions of liveliness in students oral presentation speech: A proposal for an automatic feedback mechanism, System, Vol.33, No.4, pp.575-591.
Location: Type of subjects/data: Corpus of oral presentation No. of subjects/data: 1 Instruments: Test, Task/ activity Method of analysis: - Descriptive statistics
- Prosodic analysis
- Speech analysis: e.g. pitch, speaking rate
Other aspects: - WaveSurfer software for speech analysis
- Reliability testResearch design: Level of detail: High
Keywords:
Prosody, Intonation, Pitch, Speech rate, Oral presentation skills, CALL, Speech analysis, English for specific purposes, Fluency, Learner corpora
34. Zareva, A., 2005, Models of Lexical knowledge assessment of second language learners of English at higher levels of language proficiency, System, Vol.33, No.4, pp.547-562.
Location: Type of subjects/data: NSs and L2 learners of English No. of subjects/data: 64 Instruments: Test, Dictionary Method of analysis: - Correlation
- Multiple regression analysis
- Possible regressionOther aspects: - Word sampling method
- Scoring procedures: e.g. vocabulary knowledge, word frequency effects
- Internal consistency reliability of the test (Kuder-Richardson 21 formula)Research design: Level of detail: High
Keywords:
Second language acquisition, Vocabulary, Lexical knowledge assessment, Testing
35. Gaskell, D. and Cobb, T., 2004, Can learners use concordance feedback for writing errors?, System, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 301-319.
Location: Type of subjects/data: Adult Chinese EFL learners No. of subjects/data: 20 Instruments: Task/ activity, Test, Questionnaire, Written report/ paper Method of analysis: - descriptive statistics
- t-test
- error analysisOther aspects: Research design: Level of detail: Medium
Keywords:
Computer assisted language learning, CALL, Learner concordancing, Hands-on concordancing, Error treatment, Error feedback, Grammatical awareness, Language awareness, Form focus, Focus on forms, Structured input
36. Liu, M. and Braine, G., 2005, Cohesive features in argumentative writing produced by Chinese undergraduates, System, Vol.33, No.4, pp.623-636.
Location: Type of subjects/data: Students' compositions No. of subjects/data: 50 Instruments: Method of analysis: - Identify and count cohesive device used in the compositions
- Descriptive statistics: mean, Sd, frequency, and correlationsOther aspects: Research design: Level of detail: Low
Keywords:
Cohesive features, Argumentative writing, Chinese undergrate non-English majors, Reference Tie, Conjunction tie, Lexical tie
37. Perry, B. and Stewart, T., 2005, Insights into effective partnership in interdisciplinary team teaching, System, Vol.33, No.4, pp.563-573.
Location: Type of subjects/data: Teacher No. of subjects/data: 14 Instruments: Interview Method of analysis: Content analysis Other aspects: Research design: Level of detail: Low
Keywords:
Team teaching, Collaboration, Reflective teaching
38. Martinez-Flor, A. and Fukuya, Y.J., 2005, The effects of instruction on learners' production of appropriate and accurate suggestions, System, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 463-480.
Location: Type of subjects/data: Student No. of subjects/data: 81 Instruments: Task/ activity, Test Method of analysis: - ANOVA
- post hoc analysis
- Cohen's dOther aspects: - interater reliability
- scoring system for grammatical accuracyResearch design: Level of detail: High
Keywords:
Pragmatics, Instructional effects, Foreign language learning, Focus on form, Speech acts, Suggestions, Pragmatic production, Pragmatic appropriateness, Linguistic accuracy, E-mail, Telephone
39. Soler, E.A., 2005, Does instruction work for learning pragmatics in the EFL context?, System, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 417-435.
Location: Type of subjects/data: High school student No. of subjects/data: 132 Instruments: Test, Task/ activity Method of analysis: - t-test
- ANOVAOther aspects: Awareness-raising task Research design: Level of detail: Low
Keywords:
Foreign language learning, Instructional effects, Pragmatics
40. Takahashi, S., 2005, Noticing in task performance and learning outcomes: A qualitative analysis of instructional effects in interlanguage pragmatics, System, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 437-461.
Location: Type of subjects/data: Japanese college student/ secondary data No. of subjects/data: 49 Instruments: Test, Questionnaire, Task/ activity Method of analysis: Content analysis Other aspects: Research design: Level of detail: Medium
Keywords:
Interlanguage pragmatics, Implicit learning, Noticing, Awareness, Attention, Language instruction, Input enhancement, Request
| Result Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 Next |
School of Liberal Arts © 2006