Sign in to Manage
Number of records : 706 |
Result 221-230 of 706 for |
Result Pages:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 Next
221. Li, Y. and Flowerdew, J., 2007, Shaping Chinese novice scientists' manuscripts for publication, Journal of Second Language Writing, Vol.16, Issue 2, pp.100-117.
Location: |
China |
Type of subjects/data: |
Ph.D. Student, Supervisor |
No. of subjects/data: |
12, 4 |
Instruments: |
Questionnaire, Interview, Online discussion/email, Journal/diary, Written report |
Method of analysis: |
- Coding the data collected from the interviews, emails and blogs
- Examining the textual corrections in student manuscripts
- Identifying the four types of correctors: supervisors, peers, language professionals and editorial services |
Other aspects: |
A Cyclic pattern of data collection used in data analysis to test hypotheses of the study |
Research design: |
Qualitative research |
Level of detail: |
Low |
Keywords:
Scholarly publication, EAL authors, English-language barrier, Editing, Novice scientists 222. Belcher, D.D., 2007, Seeking acceptance in an English-only research world, Journal of Second Language Writing, Vol.16, No.1, pp.1-22.
Location: |
United States |
Type of subjects/data: |
Manuscripts |
No. of subjects/data: |
29 |
Instruments: |
|
Method of analysis: |
- Content analysis
- Frequency, percentage |
Other aspects: |
- Commentary types found in the reviews
- The journal's reviewer guidelines
- Suggestions and implications for manuscript evaluation
- Reliability check |
Research design: |
Qualitative research |
Level of detail: |
Low |
Keywords:
Academic writing, Periphery scholars, Publication, Research writing 223. Yi, Y., 2007, Engaging literacy: A biliterate student's composing practices beyond school, Journal of Second Language Writing, Vol.16, No.1, pp.23-39.
Location: |
United States |
Type of subjects/data: |
Student |
No. of subjects/data: |
1 |
Instruments: |
Interview, Checklist, Document, Written report, Observation |
Method of analysis: |
- Memoing and summarizing all data
- Identifying themes
- Coding and categorizing data |
Other aspects: |
Validity of data: informal and formal member check |
Research design: |
Case study |
Level of detail: |
High |
Keywords:
Generation 1.5 students, Out-of-school writing, High school English language learners, Korean students, Biliterate students 224. Keck, C., 2006, The use of paraphrase in summary writing: A comparison of L1 and L2 writers, Journal of Second Language Writing, Vol.15, Issue 4, pp.261-278.
Location: |
United States |
Type of subjects/data: |
Student |
No. of subjects/data: |
165 |
Instruments: |
Written report, Text/ text book |
Method of analysis: |
- Identifying paraphrases
- Coding paraphrases
- Using percentage, mean, SD |
Other aspects: |
|
Research design: |
Descriptive research |
Level of detail: |
High |
Keywords:
Academic writing, Paraphrasing, Summary, Plagiarism, Second language writing 225. Cheng, A., 2006, Analyzing and enacting academic criticism: The case of an L2 graduate learner of academic writing, Journal of Second Language Writing, Vol.15, Issue 4, pp.279-306.
Location: |
United States |
Type of subjects/data: |
Student |
No. of subjects/data: |
1 |
Instruments: |
Written report, Interview |
Method of analysis: |
Content analysis |
Other aspects: |
|
Research design: |
Case study |
Level of detail: |
Low |
Keywords:
Academic criticism, Academic writing, Disciplinary culture, Rhetorical awareness, Learner characteristics 226. Lee, Y-J., 2006, The process-oriented ESL writing assessment: Promises and challenges, Journal of Second Language Writing, Vol.15, Issue 4, pp.307-330.
Location: |
United States |
Type of subjects/data: |
Student |
No. of subjects/data: |
100 |
Instruments: |
Rating scale, Essay |
Method of analysis: |
- Text analysis
- Descriptive statistics
- t-test |
Other aspects: |
- Reliability test
- Rating scale for writing assessment |
Research design: |
Descriptive research |
Level of detail: |
Medium |
Keywords:
ESL writing assessments, Process-oriented writing, Revision process, Computerized writing assessments 227. Li., Y., 2006, Negotiating knowledge contribution to multiple discourse communities: A doctoral student of computer science writing for publication, Journal of Second Language Writing, Vol.15, Issue 3, pp.159-178.
Location: |
Hong Kong |
Type of subjects/data: |
Student, University staff |
No. of subjects/data: |
4, 2 |
Instruments: |
Written report/ paper, Online discussion/email, Interview |
Method of analysis: |
Content analysis |
Other aspects: |
|
Research design: |
Case study |
Level of detail: |
Low |
Keywords:
Writing for publication, Novice scholar, Knowledge contribution, Discourse communities, Computer science research articles 228. Miao, Y., Badger, R. and Zhen, Y., 2006, A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class, Journal of Second Language Writing, Vol.15, Issue 3, pp.179-200.
Location: |
China |
Type of subjects/data: |
Student |
No. of subjects/data: |
12 |
Instruments: |
Written report/ paper, Teacher feedback, Questionnaire, Video recordings, Interview |
Method of analysis: |
- t-test
- Feedback analysis
- Analysis of revision effectiveness |
Other aspects: |
- Essay scoring guide
- Reliability test
- Revision effectivenss analysis |
Research design: |
Case study |
Level of detail: |
High |
Keywords:
Teaching writing, Teacher feedback, Peer feedback, China 229. Stevenson, M., Schoonen, R. and de Glopper, K., 2006, Revision in two languages: A multi-dimensional comparison of online writing revisions in L1 and FL, Journal of Second Language Writing, Vol.15, No.3, pp.201-233.
Location: |
Netherlands |
Type of subjects/data: |
Student, Written texts |
No. of subjects/data: |
22 |
Instruments: |
|
Method of analysis: |
- Coding the revisions: think-aloud data, keystroke data
- Rating the quality of the written texts
- z-scores (standardize the revision frequency scores of the four dimensions of the texts
- ANOVA (test whether the frequency of different types of revisions are different
- Correlation between frequency of particular types of revisions and text quality |
Other aspects: |
- Subject selection process
- Revision taxonomy
- Reliability of the test
- Keystroke analysis program (trace-it) |
Research design: |
Descriptive research |
Level of detail: |
High |
Keywords:
On-line revision, Keystroke-logging, Inhibition, Higer level processes, Revising behavior 230. Tardy, C.M., 2006, Researching first and second language genre learning: A comparative review and look ahead, Journal of Second Language writing, Vol.15, Issue 2, pp.79-101.
Location: |
United States |
Type of subjects/data: |
empirical studies |
No. of subjects/data: |
60 |
Instruments: |
|
Method of analysis: |
Genre analysis |
Other aspects: |
|
Research design: |
|
Level of detail: |
Low |
Keywords:
Genre learning, Genre research, Disciplinary writing development, L1/L2 comparisons |