Sign in to Manage
Search by show all


Number of records : 706 Result 221-230 of 706 for

Result Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71  Next


221. Li, Y. and Flowerdew, J., 2007, Shaping Chinese novice scientists' manuscripts for publication, Journal of Second Language Writing, Vol.16, Issue 2, pp.100-117.
Location:
China
Type of subjects/data: Ph.D. Student, Supervisor
No. of subjects/data: 12, 4
Instruments: Questionnaire, Interview, Online discussion/email, Journal/diary, Written report
Method of analysis: - Coding the data collected from the interviews, emails and blogs
- Examining the textual corrections in student manuscripts
- Identifying the four types of correctors: supervisors, peers, language professionals and editorial services
Other aspects: A Cyclic pattern of data collection used in data analysis to test hypotheses of the study
Research design:
Qualitative research
Level of detail: Low

Keywords:
Scholarly publication, EAL authors, English-language barrier, Editing, Novice scientists


222. Belcher, D.D., 2007, Seeking acceptance in an English-only research world, Journal of Second Language Writing, Vol.16, No.1, pp.1-22.
Location:
United States
Type of subjects/data: Manuscripts
No. of subjects/data: 29
Instruments:
Method of analysis: - Content analysis
- Frequency, percentage
Other aspects: - Commentary types found in the reviews
- The journal's reviewer guidelines
- Suggestions and implications for manuscript evaluation
- Reliability check
Research design:
Qualitative research
Level of detail: Low

Keywords:
Academic writing, Periphery scholars, Publication, Research writing


223. Yi, Y., 2007, Engaging literacy: A biliterate student's composing practices beyond school, Journal of Second Language Writing, Vol.16, No.1, pp.23-39.
Location:
United States
Type of subjects/data: Student
No. of subjects/data: 1
Instruments: Interview, Checklist, Document, Written report, Observation
Method of analysis: - Memoing and summarizing all data
- Identifying themes
- Coding and categorizing data
Other aspects: Validity of data: informal and formal member check
Research design:
Case study
Level of detail: High

Keywords:
Generation 1.5 students, Out-of-school writing, High school English language learners, Korean students, Biliterate students


224. Keck, C., 2006, The use of paraphrase in summary writing: A comparison of L1 and L2 writers, Journal of Second Language Writing, Vol.15, Issue 4, pp.261-278.
Location:
United States
Type of subjects/data: Student
No. of subjects/data: 165
Instruments: Written report, Text/ text book
Method of analysis: - Identifying paraphrases
- Coding paraphrases
- Using percentage, mean, SD
Other aspects:
Research design:
Descriptive research
Level of detail: High

Keywords:
Academic writing, Paraphrasing, Summary, Plagiarism, Second language writing


225. Cheng, A., 2006, Analyzing and enacting academic criticism: The case of an L2 graduate learner of academic writing, Journal of Second Language Writing, Vol.15, Issue 4, pp.279-306.
Location:
United States
Type of subjects/data: Student
No. of subjects/data: 1
Instruments: Written report, Interview
Method of analysis: Content analysis
Other aspects:
Research design:
Case study
Level of detail: Low

Keywords:
Academic criticism, Academic writing, Disciplinary culture, Rhetorical awareness, Learner characteristics


226. Lee, Y-J., 2006, The process-oriented ESL writing assessment: Promises and challenges, Journal of Second Language Writing, Vol.15, Issue 4, pp.307-330.
Location:
United States
Type of subjects/data: Student
No. of subjects/data: 100
Instruments: Rating scale, Essay
Method of analysis: - Text analysis
- Descriptive statistics
- t-test
Other aspects: - Reliability test
- Rating scale for writing assessment
Research design:
Descriptive research
Level of detail: Medium

Keywords:
ESL writing assessments, Process-oriented writing, Revision process, Computerized writing assessments


227. Li., Y., 2006, Negotiating knowledge contribution to multiple discourse communities: A doctoral student of computer science writing for publication, Journal of Second Language Writing, Vol.15, Issue 3, pp.159-178.
Location:
Hong Kong
Type of subjects/data: Student, University staff
No. of subjects/data: 4, 2
Instruments: Written report/ paper, Online discussion/email, Interview
Method of analysis: Content analysis
Other aspects:
Research design:
Case study
Level of detail: Low

Keywords:
Writing for publication, Novice scholar, Knowledge contribution, Discourse communities, Computer science research articles


228. Miao, Y., Badger, R. and Zhen, Y., 2006, A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class, Journal of Second Language Writing, Vol.15, Issue 3, pp.179-200.
Location:
China
Type of subjects/data: Student
No. of subjects/data: 12
Instruments: Written report/ paper, Teacher feedback, Questionnaire, Video recordings, Interview
Method of analysis: - t-test
- Feedback analysis
- Analysis of revision effectiveness
Other aspects: - Essay scoring guide
- Reliability test
- Revision effectivenss analysis
Research design:
Case study
Level of detail: High

Keywords:
Teaching writing, Teacher feedback, Peer feedback, China


229. Stevenson, M., Schoonen, R. and de Glopper, K., 2006, Revision in two languages: A multi-dimensional comparison of online writing revisions in L1 and FL, Journal of Second Language Writing, Vol.15, No.3, pp.201-233.
Location:
Netherlands
Type of subjects/data: Student, Written texts
No. of subjects/data: 22
Instruments:
Method of analysis: - Coding the revisions: think-aloud data, keystroke data
- Rating the quality of the written texts
- z-scores (standardize the revision frequency scores of the four dimensions of the texts
- ANOVA (test whether the frequency of different types of revisions are different
- Correlation between frequency of particular types of revisions and text quality
Other aspects: - Subject selection process
- Revision taxonomy
- Reliability of the test
- Keystroke analysis program (trace-it)
Research design:
Descriptive research
Level of detail: High

Keywords:
On-line revision, Keystroke-logging, Inhibition, Higer level processes, Revising behavior


230. Tardy, C.M., 2006, Researching first and second language genre learning: A comparative review and look ahead, Journal of Second Language writing, Vol.15, Issue 2, pp.79-101.
Location:
United States
Type of subjects/data: empirical studies
No. of subjects/data: 60
Instruments:
Method of analysis: Genre analysis
Other aspects:
Research design:
Level of detail: Low

Keywords:
Genre learning, Genre research, Disciplinary writing development, L1/L2 comparisons


Result Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71  Next  

School of Liberal Arts © 2006