| Sign in to Manage 
 
 
        
          | Number of records : 706 | Result 221-230 of 706 for |  
        Result Pages:
              1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71                             Next
              	       221. Li, Y. and Flowerdew, J., 2007, Shaping Chinese novice scientists' manuscripts for publication, Journal of Second Language Writing, Vol.16, Issue 2, pp.100-117.
 
 
        
          
            | Location: | China |  
            | Type of subjects/data: | Ph.D. Student, Supervisor |  
            | No. of subjects/data: | 12, 4 |  
	  		  
            | Instruments: | Questionnaire, Interview, Online discussion/email, Journal/diary, Written report |  
            | Method of analysis: | - Coding the data collected from the interviews, emails and blogs - Examining the textual corrections in student manuscripts
 - Identifying the four types of correctors: supervisors, peers, language professionals and editorial services
 |  
            | Other aspects: | A Cyclic pattern of data collection used in data analysis to test hypotheses of the study |  
            | Research design: | Qualitative research |  
            | Level of detail: | Low |  Keywords:Scholarly publication, EAL authors, English-language barrier, Editing, Novice scientists
 222. Belcher, D.D., 2007, Seeking acceptance in an English-only research world, Journal of Second Language Writing, Vol.16, No.1, pp.1-22.
 
 
        
          
            | Location: | United States |  
            | Type of subjects/data: | Manuscripts |  
            | No. of subjects/data: | 29 |  
	  		  
            | Instruments: |  |  
            | Method of analysis: | - Content analysis - Frequency, percentage
 |  
            | Other aspects: | - Commentary types found in the reviews - The journal's reviewer guidelines
 - Suggestions and implications for manuscript evaluation
 - Reliability check
 |  
            | Research design: | Qualitative research |  
            | Level of detail: | Low |  Keywords:Academic writing, Periphery scholars, Publication, Research writing
 223. Yi, Y., 2007, Engaging literacy: A biliterate student's composing practices beyond school, Journal of Second Language Writing, Vol.16, No.1, pp.23-39.
 
 
        
          
            | Location: | United States |  
            | Type of subjects/data: | Student |  
            | No. of subjects/data: | 1 |  
	  		  
            | Instruments: | Interview, Checklist, Document, Written report, Observation |  
            | Method of analysis: | - Memoing and summarizing all data - Identifying themes
 - Coding and categorizing data
 |  
            | Other aspects: | Validity of data: informal and formal member check |  
            | Research design: | Case study |  
            | Level of detail: | High |  Keywords:Generation 1.5 students, Out-of-school writing, High school English language learners, Korean students, Biliterate students
 224. Keck, C., 2006, The use of paraphrase in summary writing: A comparison of L1 and L2 writers, Journal of Second Language  Writing, Vol.15, Issue 4, pp.261-278.
 
 
        
          
            | Location: | United States |  
            | Type of subjects/data: | Student |  
            | No. of subjects/data: | 165 |  
	  		  
            | Instruments: | Written report, Text/ text book |  
            | Method of analysis: | - Identifying paraphrases - Coding paraphrases
 - Using percentage, mean, SD
 |  
            | Other aspects: |  |  
            | Research design: | Descriptive research |  
            | Level of detail: | High |  Keywords:Academic writing, Paraphrasing, Summary, Plagiarism, Second language writing
 225. Cheng, A., 2006, Analyzing and enacting academic criticism: The case of an L2 graduate learner of academic writing, Journal of Second Language Writing, Vol.15, Issue 4, pp.279-306.
 
 
        
          
            | Location: | United States |  
            | Type of subjects/data: | Student |  
            | No. of subjects/data: | 1 |  
	  		  
            | Instruments: | Written report, Interview |  
            | Method of analysis: | Content analysis |  
            | Other aspects: |  |  
            | Research design: | Case study |  
            | Level of detail: | Low |  Keywords:Academic criticism, Academic writing, Disciplinary culture, Rhetorical awareness, Learner characteristics
 226. Lee, Y-J., 2006, The process-oriented ESL writing assessment: Promises and challenges, Journal of Second Language Writing, Vol.15, Issue 4, pp.307-330.
 
 
        
          
            | Location: | United States |  
            | Type of subjects/data: | Student |  
            | No. of subjects/data: | 100 |  
	  		  
            | Instruments: | Rating scale, Essay |  
            | Method of analysis: | - Text analysis - Descriptive statistics
 - t-test
 |  
            | Other aspects: | - Reliability test - Rating scale for writing assessment
 |  
            | Research design: | Descriptive research |  
            | Level of detail: | Medium |  Keywords:ESL writing assessments, Process-oriented writing, Revision process, Computerized writing assessments
 227. Li., Y., 2006, Negotiating knowledge contribution to multiple discourse communities: A doctoral student of computer science writing for publication, Journal of Second Language Writing, Vol.15, Issue 3, pp.159-178.
 
 
        
          
            | Location: | Hong Kong |  
            | Type of subjects/data: | Student, University staff |  
            | No. of subjects/data: | 4, 2 |  
	  		  
            | Instruments: | Written report/ paper, Online discussion/email, Interview |  
            | Method of analysis: | Content analysis |  
            | Other aspects: |  |  
            | Research design: | Case study |  
            | Level of detail: | Low |  Keywords:Writing for publication, Novice scholar, Knowledge contribution, Discourse communities, Computer science research articles
 228. Miao, Y., Badger, R. and Zhen, Y., 2006, A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class, Journal of Second Language Writing, Vol.15, Issue 3, pp.179-200.
 
 
        
          
            | Location: | China |  
            | Type of subjects/data: | Student |  
            | No. of subjects/data: | 12 |  
	  		  
            | Instruments: | Written report/ paper, Teacher feedback, Questionnaire, Video recordings, Interview |  
            | Method of analysis: | - t-test - Feedback analysis
 - Analysis of revision effectiveness
 |  
            | Other aspects: | - Essay scoring guide - Reliability test
 - Revision effectivenss analysis
 |  
            | Research design: | Case study |  
            | Level of detail: | High |  Keywords:Teaching writing, Teacher feedback, Peer feedback, China
 229. Stevenson, M., Schoonen, R. and de Glopper, K., 2006, Revision in two languages: A multi-dimensional comparison of online writing revisions in L1 and FL, Journal of Second Language Writing, Vol.15, No.3, pp.201-233.
 
 
        
          
            | Location: | Netherlands |  
            | Type of subjects/data: | Student, Written texts |  
            | No. of subjects/data: | 22 |  
	  		  
            | Instruments: |  |  
            | Method of analysis: | - Coding the revisions: think-aloud data, keystroke data - Rating the quality of the written texts
 - z-scores (standardize the revision frequency scores of the four dimensions of the texts
 - ANOVA (test whether the frequency of different types of revisions are different
 - Correlation between frequency of particular types of revisions and text quality
 |  
            | Other aspects: | - Subject selection process - Revision taxonomy
 - Reliability of the test
 - Keystroke analysis program (trace-it)
 |  
            | Research design: | Descriptive research |  
            | Level of detail: | High |  Keywords:On-line revision, Keystroke-logging, Inhibition, Higer level processes, Revising behavior
 230. Tardy, C.M., 2006, Researching first and second language genre learning: A comparative review and look ahead, Journal of Second Language writing, Vol.15, Issue 2, pp.79-101.
 
 
        
          
            | Location: | United States |  
            | Type of subjects/data: | empirical studies |  
            | No. of subjects/data: | 60 |  
	  		  
            | Instruments: |  |  
            | Method of analysis: | Genre analysis |  
            | Other aspects: |  |  
            | Research design: |  |  
            | Level of detail: | Low |  Keywords:Genre learning, Genre research, Disciplinary writing development, L1/L2 comparisons
 
 |