| Sign in to Manage 
 
 
        
          | Number of records : 706 | Result 311-320 of 706 for |  
        Result Pages:
              1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71                             Next
              	       311. Küçük, F. and Walters, J., 2009, How good is your test, ELT Journal, Vol.63, No.4, pp.332-341.
 
 
        
          
            | Location: | Turkey |  
            | Type of subjects/data: | student, teacher |  
            | No. of subjects/data: | 52, 29 |  
	  		  
            | Instruments: | Questionnaire, Test |  
            | Method of analysis: | - mean - correlations (Spearman's rho)
 |  
            | Other aspects: | - questionnaire to assess acheivement tests - ways to evaluate the appropriateness of achievement tests
 |  
            | Research design: | Testing research |  
            | Level of detail: | Low |  Keywords:test validity, test reliability, acheivement test, face validity
 312. Gilmore, A., 2009, Using online corpora to develop students' writing skills, ELT Journal, Vol.63, No.4, pp.363-372.
 
 
        
          
            | Location: | Japan |  
            | Type of subjects/data: | student |  
            | No. of subjects/data: | 45 |  
	  		  
            | Instruments: | Written report/ paper, Corpus |  
            | Method of analysis: | - error analysis - percentages of students preference for the corpora
 |  
            | Other aspects: | - advantages and disadvantages of feedback for written work - BNC and COBUILD characteristics
 - training materials used in the error correction task
 |  
            | Research design: | Exploratory research |  
            | Level of detail: | Low |  Keywords:corpus, BNC, COBUILD Corpus, Collocations sampler, writing, error correction
 313. González, J.A., Promoting student autonomy through the use of the European Language Portfolio, ELT Journal, Vol.63, No.4, pp.373-382.
 
 
        
          
            | Location: | Spain |  
            | Type of subjects/data: | adult learner, teacher |  
            | No. of subjects/data: | 98, N/A |  
	  		  
            | Instruments: | Questionnaire |  
            | Method of analysis: | - percentage |  
            | Other aspects: |  |  
            | Research design: |  |  
            | Level of detail: | Low |  Keywords:portfolio, European Language Portfolio (ELP)
 314. Bitchener, J. and Knoch, U., 2009, The value of a focused approach to written corrective feedback, ELT Journal, Vol.63, No.3, pp.204-211.
 
 
        
          
            | Location: | New Zealand |  
            | Type of subjects/data: | student |  
            | No. of subjects/data: | 52 |  
	  		  
            | Instruments: | Test |  
            | Method of analysis: | - descriptive statistics - ANOVA
 |  
            | Other aspects: | procedures for giving the three types of written corrective feedback |  
            | Research design: | Quasi-experimental research |  
            | Level of detail: | Medium |  Keywords:feedback, error
 315. Farrell, T. S. C. , 2009, Critical reflection in a TESL course: mapping conceptual change, ELT Journal, Vol.63, No.3, pp.221-229.
 
 
        
          
            | Location: | Canada |  
            | Type of subjects/data: | MA student |  
            | No. of subjects/data: | 7 |  
	  		  
            | Instruments: | Task/ activity, Journal/diary, Discussion, Interview |  
            | Method of analysis: | - analyze concept maps using keyword method - frequency
 |  
            | Other aspects: |  |  
            | Research design: | Qualitative research |  
            | Level of detail: | Medium |  Keywords:TESL, concept map, reflection
 316. Prapaisit de Segovia, L. and Hardison, D. M., 2009, Implementing education reform: EFL teachers’ perspectives, ELT Journal, Vol.63, No.2, pp.154-162.
 
 
        
          
            | Location: | Thailand |  
            | Type of subjects/data: | supervisor, teacher |  
            | No. of subjects/data: | 4, 3 |  
	  		  
            | Instruments: | Observation, Interview |  
            | Method of analysis: | content analysis |  
            | Other aspects: | subject selection |  
            | Research design: | Survey research |  
            | Level of detail: | Low |  Keywords:education reform, policy, Ministry of Education (MoE)
 317. Scheffler, P., 2009, Rule difficulty and the usefulness of instruction, ELT Journal, Vol.63, No.1, pp.5-12.
 
 
        
          
            | Location: | Poland |  
            | Type of subjects/data: | adult learner |  
            | No. of subjects/data: | 100 |  
	  		  
            | Instruments: | Questionnaire |  
            | Method of analysis: | - mean score - Wilcoxon matched pairs signed ranks test
 |  
            | Other aspects: |  |  
            | Research design: | Quantitative research |  
            | Level of detail: | Low |  Keywords:instruction, grammar
 318. Lee, I., 2009, Ten mismatches between teachers' beliefs and written feedback practice, ELT Journal, Vol.63, No.1, pp.13-22.
 
 
        
          
            | Location: | Hong Kong |  
            | Type of subjects/data: | teacher, text |  
            | No. of subjects/data: | 232, 174 |  
	  		  
            | Instruments: | Text/ text book, Interview, Questionnaire |  
            | Method of analysis: | - written feedback analysis: identification, categorization, counting of feedback points - descriptive statistical analysis
 - content analysis
 |  
            | Other aspects: |  |  
            | Research design: |  |  
            | Level of detail: | Medium |  Keywords:teachers' beliefs, written feedback, error correction
 319. Allan, R., 2009,  Can a graded reader corpus provide ‘authentic’ input?, ELT Journal,  Vol.63, No.1, pp.23-32.
 
 
        
          
            | Location: | Ireland |  
            | Type of subjects/data: | Graded reader corpus |  
            | No. of subjects/data: | 2 |  
	  		  
            | Instruments: | Corpus |  
            | Method of analysis: | - compare lexical chunks in graded copora and the BNC - examine word frequency, type, and composition
 |  
            | Other aspects: | - Wordsmith Tools |  
            | Research design: |  |  
            | Level of detail: | Low |  Keywords:graded reader texts, corpus, data-driven learning (DDL), authenticity
 320. Hirano, E., 2009, Learning difficulty and learner identity: a symbiotic relationship, ELT Journal, Vol.63, No.1, 33-41 doi:10.1093/elt/ccn021
 
 
        
          
            | Location: | Brazil |  
            | Type of subjects/data: | adult learner, teacher |  
            | No. of subjects/data: | 1, 1 |  
	  		  
            | Instruments: | Interview, Journal/diary |  
            | Method of analysis: |  |  
            | Other aspects: |  |  
            | Research design: | Ethnographic research |  
            | Level of detail: | Low |  Keywords:learning difficulty, identity
 
 |